On 16 Oct 2016, at 19:28, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> I've been tinkering with setting up SPF-based filtering on my mail
> server, and I was surprised to find out that most of the traffic
> it would want to throw away is Postgres mailing list messages.
> Why is it that there's no SPF record for postgresql.org? I realize
> that there's debate about how useful SPF actually is, but surely
> that's not a reason not to publish an SPF entry.
As an extra data point, the lack of SPF and DKIM for postgresql.org
is a bit of a pain when using @postgresql.org email address too. :(
Especially to Yahoo email users.
Maybe thankfully, Yahoo might not be a problem for that much longer. ;)
+ Justin
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi