On 11 July 2010 15:13, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote:
>>
>> I don't know if this right or not, but the license info on
>> http://www.postgresql.org/about/press/presskit84.html.en (BSD) doesn't
>> match the main license page: http://www.postgresql.org/about/licence
>> (PostgreSQL)
>
> well the licence got clarified after 8.4 was released, not sure if we should
> edit the presskit text after the fact - comments?
>
Actually, I agree with that. It should stay.
>>
>> The alphas page contains redundant info about 9.0a4:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/developer/alpha which is linked to by this
>> page: http://www.postgresql.org/developer/testing
>
> I don't follow - what kind of information do you find redundant on that
> page? Or are you actually wondering about the fact that we still have alpha
> information up when we are already at Beta2(3)?
>
I just mention it as someone who doesn't know the current state of
things may go to the alphas page assuming that's the latest version.
I don't see any benefit in providing links to alpha builds when
they're long out of date. Or at least mention that they've been
preceded by betas.
>>
>> For some reason, the Turkish press kit on
>> http://www.postgresql.org/about/press/ is served with the text/troff
>> mime type. Is this normal?
>
> heh - that's triggered by the file ending and apache's mod_mime - will see
> what I can do about that (though I wonder why nobody noticed so far)...
>
Thought that might be the case.
Thanks
Thom