On 07.11.2005, at 14:07 Uhr, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> We had this question earlier this week. Mac OS X uses the locales from
> FreeBSD, and neither support UTF-8 collation at all. You'll see
> exactly
> the same results from other UNIX utilities.
I think I was the one who asked.
I worked on my locale problem on the weekend and was able to build a
LC_COLLATE file, that actually works with ISO locales, but not with
UTF-8 (50% progress ... ;-)).
When you test the UNIX utility "sort" on Mac OS X, you should be
aware, that the pre-installed version on Mac OS X ignores locales at
all ... :-( I had to install the gnu coreutils to get a sort that
works with locales, and this also fails on UTF-8 but works with ISO
encoding/collate - same as PG does.
Now I'm not sure, whether my own LC_COLLATE file is not appropriate
for UTF-8 (why not?) or whether Mac OS X locale does not support
UTF-8 at all as you state.
> Sometime in the near future (hopefully) PostgreSQL will provide locale
> support independant of the underlying operating system, but for now
> you're stuck.
Will be cool to have locale support directly in PostgreSQL.
So, just a quick question regarding a switch: is there a problem with
using ISO8859-15 for now, and do a switch later with dumping the data
and import it to a newer version which should then use UTF-8? Do I
need to do some conversion or how does this work?
Thanks for your help!
cug