-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, April 11, 2007 12:10:15 -0400 Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> I checked both of those last night when you reported it ... there was one
>> spam in -bugs and a few from Kris Kennedy in -hackers, but that was it ...
>
> I think the problem is that it shouldn't just be checked when somebody
> complains, but on a periodical basis.
My point was that obviously someone has been checking, since there was only a
couple in -hackers that were <24hr old, and -bugs had nothing but one spam ...
>
>> - --On Wednesday, April 11, 2007 10:26:22 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 08:43:06AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> >>> Which lists are slow?
>> >
>> >> In my case, -patches and -committers. Looking at the thread I *think* Tom
>> >> was referring to, also -hackers.
>> >
>> > At the time I was particularly concerned about -hackers and -bugs, but
>> > I'm not sure which lists have the issue overall. I regularly notice
>> > batches of two-or-three-day-old messages being released together,
>> > perhaps several times a week, and hadn't paid any particular attention
>> > to which lists they were on. I file all the PG lists I read (which is
>> > most of them) into one folder, so it all kinda blurs together ... but
>> > I think -bugs is in need of more attention because it's particularly
>> > likely to get submissions from non-subscribers.
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFGHRq14QvfyHIvDvMRAigqAJ9JW8gb1NhDUxFEdUDghR0lx2v6TwCfU9WA
aWFCcUoDZ9glLmxbLP3sR+Y=
=V5F3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----