Re: New blog - who dis?

On 23/11/2023 15:40, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 11:44 PM Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <ads@pgug.de> wrote:
>> On 11/09/2023 16:09, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 8:01 AM Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <ads@pgug.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 2:16 PM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 2:47 PM Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <ads@pgug.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 1:00 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2023-Sep-04, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I plan to migrate my blog to a new software platform, which
>>>>>>>> will also change the URLs which appear in the RSS feed. There
>>>>>>>> is no convenient way to keep the old URLs in place.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Most importantly, this will affect Planet PostgreSQL, which
>>>>>>>> suddenly might see about 150 "new" blog postings.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is there a recommended way how to deal with such a move?
>>>>>>> Each post in the blog has a "guid" unique identifier, which is usually
>>>>>>> the same as the URL, but some platforms let you set up something
>>>>>>> different.  If you can "migrate" your posts to the new platform while
>>>>>>> keeping the GUIDs, that would be best -- they would not be seen as new
>>>>>>> posts.  The actual URLs don't actually matter.
>>>>>> The guid in my case is the full URL of the posting, including the domain.
>>>>>> I would need to break and fix quite a few things to port this guid over to
>>>>>> the new system, and I can easily miss something before going live.
>>>>> You wouldn't need to keep the URL for the new posts, only the GUIDs.
>>>>> That is, new posts could have GUIDs in a new format, old posts could
>>>>> just use the old URL in the GUID and the new URL in the, well, URL.
>>>> That's a theme change which I more or less permanently need to
>>>> maintain. I'd avoid that, if possible.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> I'd rather not go down this path.
>>>>> Strictly speaking, per the RSS requirements, you have to.  Not donig
>>>>> so will cause reposts for anybody *else* who is tracking your RSS feed
>>>>> as well, not just Planet PostgreSQL.
>>>> Correct, but I'm mostly worried about spamming Planet.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> * No posts older than 7 days will get posted to *twitter*. They only
>>>>> go in the planet RSS feed(s).
>>>>> * The planet RSS feeds contain 30 items. The homepage as well. At this
>>>>> point you can see this goes back to Aug 24, so not very far. That
>>>>> means that any entries older than that will be ingested into the
>>>>> system, but they won't actually be shown to anybody.
>>>>> * The feed passed through to www.postgresql.org further restricts this
>>>>> to just the past 10
>>>>>
>>>>> So this would indicate that if you have a period of say 2 weeks of no
>>>>> postings, *planet* won't notice. Others might.
>>>> Basically not posting to Planet from this blog for 2-3 weeks, and maybe
>>>> giving someone a heads-up should do the job?
>>> Yes. Note the date of your last post and keep an eye out on
>>> planet.postgresql.org and make sure that date has "scrolled off the
>>> end". Once it has, and it's >7 days, then you are safe from a planet
>>> perspective.
>> Well, can report that I made sure that the old feed url sends a 301
>> (permanently moved) to the new feed url.
>>
>> However Planet doesn't like this:
>>
>> Feed returned redirect (http 301)
>>
>> And marks the request as "Failure".
>>
>> Looks like the new feed url must be updated (and then the blog goes into
>> review).
> Yeah, this is normal -- planet only autodiscovers redirects to the
> https version of the same one. If you change the contents of the URL,
> it will get sent back for moderation. (For the *RSS* that is - any
> *links* will of course be followed, because that's done by the
> browser)

What does "the same one" mean? I had a 301 to "the same content"
- aka the feed - in place, and planet complained about the 301.

That's when I updated the feed url, which then naturally went into
moderation.

By the way: who does the moderation?
The new URL is still stuck in moderation.