Re: Not clear spelling about transaction

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: Not clear spelling about transaction
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwbX+VvG2mWjRTbidNFpkaRb7ZGsT1Kme=zKs2M=RTnKzw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Not clear spelling about transaction  (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
Список pgsql-docs
Дерево обсуждения
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 1:07 PM PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/continuous-archiving.html
Description:

>No committed transactions will be lost

Hello. It is not clear to me. Did you mean:
Not committed transactions will be lost
Or
None of committed transactions will be lost
?

It would be simpler if you write that explicitly:
All committed transactions will not be lost.

"Committed transactions will not be lost."

The word "No" means "none", it doesn't mean "not".

David J.



В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: PG Doc comments form
Дата:
Сообщение: missing GRANTED BY explanations
Следующее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: missing GRANTED BY explanations