Обсуждение: Not clear spelling about transaction
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/continuous-archiving.html Description: >No committed transactions will be lost Hello. It is not clear to me. Did you mean: Not committed transactions will be lost Or None of committed transactions will be lost ? It would be simpler if you write that explicitly: All committed transactions will not be lost.
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 1:07 PM PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/continuous-archiving.html
Description:
>No committed transactions will be lost
Hello. It is not clear to me. Did you mean:
Not committed transactions will be lost
Or
None of committed transactions will be lost
?
It would be simpler if you write that explicitly:
All committed transactions will not be lost.
"Committed transactions will not be lost."
The word "No" means "none", it doesn't mean "not".
David J.