Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Adam Brusselback
Тема Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Дата
Msg-id CAMjNa7dwFyVLJWHJOudemz-sTZJ5QLhnNSSDN+9d3BEZHPV4XA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Ravi Krishna <sravikrishna@comcast.net>)
Ответы Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-general
>  How good will that be in performance.

In my experience, not great. It's definitely better than not having it at all, but it does not make for quick queries and caused serious connection overhead when a query referenced that foreign table. I've since moved to logical replication to improve the situation there.

In SQL Server I had never noticed the difference when I had to do cross-db queries. There may or may not be a difference, but it was never something that I had to think about or look up, so I am not sure.

It's something I do still miss though, as it sure was convenient.

Just my $0.02.
-Adam 

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Kellerer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Следующее
От: Guyren Howe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment