Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David E. Wheeler
Тема Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Дата
Msg-id E3F77D42-E4EF-4073-904E-6C517663902C@kineticode.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sep 9, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Well, none, *if* it's defined to have exactly the same runtime  
> behavior
> as anyelement does.  It sounded like you were arguing for something
> looser.  We could certainly define it as being just like anyelement
> but not constrained to match any other argument or result (and, hence,
> not usable as a result type).

Yes, that sounds about right. Is that not basically what Alvaro was  
looking for to start with? And is there an "any" array that could work  
for variadic functions like sprintf(), as well?

Best,

David


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Следующее
От: "David E. Wheeler"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types