Re: CoC [Final v2]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christophe Pettus
Тема Re: CoC [Final v2]
Дата
Msg-id FB6D8197-FC54-4F18-8A7D-E0E84456788C@thebuild.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: CoC [Final v2]  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>)
Ответы Re: CoC [Final v2]  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
Re: CoC [Final v2]  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Jan 24, 2016, at 2:48 PM, "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com> wrote:

> I think that’s planned for a separate document, to be linked.

I think those need to put in place at the same time.  It's very hard to judge how good or bad a CoC is absent a
reportingmechanism. 

I'd respectfully suggest that we table the discussion of the CoC text at this point, let the high passions moderate a
bit,and talk about the process.  That is the detail in which the devils will live. 

--
-- Christophe Pettus
   xof@thebuild.com



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David E. Wheeler"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CoC [Final v2]
Следующее
От: Victor Yegorov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A motion