On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Larry ganga giri wrote:
>
> What is ORDBMS alone?OO for Object Oriented.
> little bit confused.
object-relational, perhaps.
Zsolt
> Can u tell me what are the traits off?
> thanks,
> Larry.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2000 11:33:39 The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
> >PostgreSQL is label'd an ORDBMS (not OO), which tends to mean that it
> >carries some traits of, but is not fully, OO ...
> >
> >One of our developers (Chris Bitmead?) has been spending time on improving
> >the OO capabilities, with improvements brought into v7.0 (soon to be
> >released) ...
> >
> >As for "comparing with MySQL" ... it doesn't. MySQL is essentially a
> >bunch of flat files with an SQL implementation over top of it to access
> >them ... it doesn't support key features required to be construed as a
> >true RDBMS, main one being to me is its complete lack (and disregard) for
> >transactions/rollback ...
> >
> >
> >On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Larry ganga giri wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have doubts reg architecture of Pgsql.
> >>
> >> Is an OORDBMS?or mere RDBMS?
> >>
> >> Can anybody compare with MySQL?
> >>
> >> need details urgently.
> >>
> >> Advanced thanx,
> >> Larry.
> >>
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________________________
> >> Get your own free England E-mail address at http://www.england.com
> >>
> >
> >Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
> >Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> >primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> Get your own free England E-mail address at http://www.england.com
>