On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 10:56:27AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 10:35 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 08:14:04PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/pgupgrade.html
> > Description:
> >
> > I feel like for readability the pg_upgrade doc should use the same
> > old_version and new_version examples when showing examples throughout the
> > doc page.
> >
> > as an exmaple I'm looking at :
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/pgupgrade.html
> >
> > in some places the example commands use v9.6 and v16. (see step 8)
> >
> > but in other places it mixes versions v9.5 and v9.6 (see step 11 sub step
> 8)
>
> Good point. I came up with the attached patch. It uses 9.6 and current
>
>
> I would get rid of any mentions of our old pre-v10 versioning scheme in the
> current documentation.
Good point, how is this attached patch?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.