Re: [GENERAL] Finally upgrading to 9.6!

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Igal @ Lucee.org
Тема Re: [GENERAL] Finally upgrading to 9.6!
Дата
Msg-id b2780b3e-2666-54b6-a30b-be655389b5af@lucee.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] Finally upgrading to 9.6!  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] Finally upgrading to 9.6!  (Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On 10/18/2017 6:24 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 10/17/2017 11:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:
Where can I look to see (roughly) how much more RAM/CPU/disk needed when
moving from 8.4 and 9.2?
It's entirely possible you'll need *less*, as you'll be absorbing the
benefit of several years' worth of performance improvements.  But this
is such a workload-dependent thing that there's no general answer.

XML stored in blobs (not sure whether text or bytea) and b-tree indexes.


A bit off-topic here, but why upgrade to 9.6 when you can upgrade to 10.0? 

Obviously you're not one to upgrade often so shouldn't you take advantage of all of the new features and improvements when "finally" (to use your own word) upgrading?

Igal Sapir
Lucee Core Developer
Lucee.org

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ron Johnson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Finally upgrading to 9.6!
Следующее
От: Achilleas Mantzios
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Finally upgrading to 9.6!