Обсуждение: to realise the dark side of Microsoft SQL Server...?
Please elaborate! (Many a true word spoken in jest<g>) "That is until I can convince my new employer to realise the dark side of Microsoft SQL Server." Dave Page wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:20:32 +0900 >> Paul Lambert <paul.lambert@reynolds.com.au> wrote: >> >>> I'm just disappointed that I finish up work with my current employer >>> on Friday and where I am going I won't get to work with PG anymore >>> and thus won't have as much opportunity to interact with the PG >>> community. >>> That is until I can convince my new employer to realise the dark side >>> of Microsoft SQL Server. :) -- Johan van Zyl johan@jvz.co.za http://www.jvz.co.za johan@acctual.net http://www.acctual.co.za johan@watzon.co.za http://www.watzon.co.za 079 549 0034 Cell/Mobile 012 543 2919 Huis/Home 086 622 9554 Fax Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good! Teach a man how to surf the Internet and he will never bother you again.
Johan van Zyl wrote: > Please elaborate! (Many a true word spoken in jest<g>) > "That is until I can convince my new employer to realise the dark side > of Microsoft SQL Server." It's the product of an evil company? Let's see: 1. they are virtually a monopoly 2. they use their monopoly to tie folks to their product upgrade merry-go-round. 3. They purchase companies to destroy competition. 4. They generate FUD rather then innovate. 5. The Novell agreement? 6. They coerce computer makers to not only preload their operating system, but coerce them into promoting it. 7. the OOXML debacle? The list continues, but I suspect you get my point. -- Until later, Geoffrey Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Benjamin Franklin
Geoffrey wrote: > Johan van Zyl wrote: >> Please elaborate! (Many a true word spoken in jest<g>) >> "That is until I can convince my new employer to realise the dark side >> of Microsoft SQL Server." > > It's the product of an evil company? Let's see: > > 1. they are virtually a monopoly > 2. they use their monopoly to tie folks to their product upgrade > merry-go-round. > 3. They purchase companies to destroy competition. > 4. They generate FUD rather then innovate. > 5. The Novell agreement? > 6. They coerce computer makers to not only preload their operating > system, but coerce them into promoting it. > 7. the OOXML debacle? > > The list continues, but I suspect you get my point. You are assuming most people care. 1. You have to pay for the the OS. 2. You have to pay for the database. 3. You have to pay for any "extra" feature. That is where you start. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Geoffrey wrote: >> Johan van Zyl wrote: >>> Please elaborate! (Many a true word spoken in jest<g>) >>> "That is until I can convince my new employer to realise the dark side >>> of Microsoft SQL Server." >> >> It's the product of an evil company? Let's see: >> >> 1. they are virtually a monopoly >> 2. they use their monopoly to tie folks to their product upgrade >> merry-go-round. >> 3. They purchase companies to destroy competition. >> 4. They generate FUD rather then innovate. >> 5. The Novell agreement? >> 6. They coerce computer makers to not only preload their operating >> system, but coerce them into promoting it. >> 7. the OOXML debacle? >> >> The list continues, but I suspect you get my point. > > You are assuming most people care. No, I'm trying to educate people. I was answering the question of the previous poster. If people begin to understand the issues, they will begin to care. At least some of them. > 1. You have to pay for the the OS. > 2. You have to pay for the database. > 3. You have to pay for any "extra" feature. > > That is where you start. Agreed. -- Until later, Geoffrey Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Benjamin Franklin
On Dec 19, 4:23 pm, li...@serioustechnology.com (Geoffrey) wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Geoffrey wrote: > >> Johan van Zyl wrote: > >>> Please elaborate! (Many a true word spoken in jest<g>) > >>> "That is until I can convince my new employer to realise the dark side > >>> of Microsoft SQL Server." > > >> It's the product of an evil company? Let's see: > > >> 1. they are virtually a monopoly > >> 2. they use their monopoly to tie folks to their product upgrade > >> merry-go-round. > >> 3. They purchase companies to destroy competition. > >> 4. They generate FUD rather then innovate. > >> 5. The Novell agreement? > >> 6. They coerce computer makers to not only preload their operating > >> system, but coerce them into promoting it. > >> 7. the OOXML debacle? > > >> The list continues, but I suspect you get my point. > > > You are assuming most people care. > > No, I'm trying to educate people. I was answering the question of the > previous poster. If people begin to understand the issues, they will > begin to care. At least some of them. > > > 1. You have to pay for the the OS. > > 2. You have to pay for the database. > > 3. You have to pay for any "extra" feature. > > > That is where you start. > > Agreed. > > -- > Until later, Geoffrey > > Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little > temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. > - Benjamin Franklin > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majord...@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly The point is "certification". As the number of softwarehouses grows up, and so on the number of software solutions, companies are seeking from mature and professional solutions. But most of them does not know postgres because it have not a "commercial" certification. Even here (Brazil), middle-size companies are changing their PostgreSQL databases and migrating to IBM DB2 Community Edition. That's all for certified employees, who can "guarantee" virtually the security and functioning of host applications.