> On 22 Aug 2023, at 05:23, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
>
> On 8/21/23 10:55 AM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> On 8/21/23 7:58 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>>> On 11 Aug 2023, at 02:23, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The last time this came up, I think we discussed linking to the wiki page from the docs, vs. trying to keep the
docsup-to-date with all of the drivers available. Perhaps it's worth seeing if we want to make any changes to the docs
pageprior to the v16 GA?
>>>
>>> The docs page does mention that the list is likely to be incomplete, with the
>>> following sentence, but there is no mention of the Wiki page at all:
>>>
>>> "Table H.1 includes a list of some of these projects."
>>>
>>> That being said, a lot of readers will likely skim over and immediately look at
>>> the table, missing the small disclaimer. I wonder if we aren't serving our
>>> users better by removing the table and only referring to the Wiki page? Having
>>> two lists will prompt the discussion of what to include where over and over
>>> again, which isn't helping anyone.
>> This is what I was saying. I was waiting on attempting a patch to see if there was consensus. There's now a couple
ofthreads now with similar suggestions, I'll work on getting patches ready.
>
> Suggested patch attached. Notes:
>
> 1. Replaced language to reference the wiki page
> 2. Replaced table with the URL
> 3. Changed the "licenses" comment to be more affirmative, i.e., there are language interfaces that are released under
licensesdifferent than the PostgreSQL Licence.
This is in line with what I imagined as well, so unless anyone thinks otherwise
I will apply this and backpatch it to all branches.
--
Daniel Gustafsson