On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 23:05 -0400, Scott Mead wrote:
>
> > That reminds me... Why do we give link to some binary RPMs, where
> SRPMs
> > are not available?
>
> Those RPMs are built using the certified binaries that the community
> distributes already, but simplifies installation in deeply
> firewalled / headless server environments. They also allow for
> side-by-side installs of major versions ( pg_upgrade compatible ) and
> have since their inception.
That is not an answer to my question. Why don't you distribute the SRPM?
How can someone make sure that the RPMs do not include some more extra
code?
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz